- Oluwafemi Ebenezer Jegede 1*, Adekunle Saheed Ajisebiyawo 2 & Morris Edogiawerie 3
- 1, 2, 3 Department of Political Science and Public Administration Igbinedion University Okada, Edo State, Nigeria
- DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17408414
This article discussed internal democracy and opposition politics among Nigeria political parties focusing on the two leading opposition parties, the Labor Party and the Peoples’ Democratic Party. The paper examined the role played by historical development, ethnic politics, godfatherism, ideological clarity and internal democracy in influencing the effectiveness of these opposition parties in Nigeria political parties’ politics in the Fourth Republic. Using in-depth interviews, 60 respondents were purposively selected from six states that represent the six (6) geo-political zones in Nigeria: Ekiti, Bayelsa, Enugu, Kwara, Zamfara, and Yobe. The analysis showed that there were significant differences between the two parties. Anchored on elite theory which is premised on the belief that in every society irrespective of whether they are autocracies, democracies, or transitional regimes, political power always ends up being concentrated in the hands of a small cohesive minority. This paper then found that PDP is more firmly elite-controlled and historically conditioned while the LP is seen as having greater democratic potential despite organizational constraints. The results showed that the two parties are affected by systemic challenges that undermine their ability to perform as an opposition, which are expressed in different ways in accordance with institutional maturity and organisational culture. It was also found that the PDP’s established networks are stable but undemocratic and the LP’s youth-led emergence is democratically innovative but constrained by institutional inexperience. The paper advocated radical internal party restructuring, empowered democratic institutions, foster ideological clarity and comparative learning programmes to improve opposition performance and contribute to the consolidation of democracy in Nigeria. These findings have implications for the study of opposition politics in transitional democracies and offer empirical models for institutional capacity building in Nigeria’s evolving democratic environment.
