- Antonio Clareti Pereira, PhD*
- PhD in Chemical Engineering University of São Paulo (USP) Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
- DOI:10.5281/zenodo.21969803
Jarosite
precipitation remains an important route for removing ferric iron and
incorporating sulfate into the precipitate in acidic hydrometallurgical
liquors, yet process performance is often judged solely by iron removal. This
structured critical narrative review evaluates jarosite as a coupled reaction–particle
engineering–separation–residue system. The updated bibliography contains 102
references: 99 scientific sources used in the synthesis, two methodological
sources, and one earlier authorial review retained only for transparent
positioning of novelty. A documented literature update through 8 August 2026
adds recent evidence on integrated Fe–Pb–Zn recovery, selective Pb extraction,
and indium recovery from industrial jarosite. Quantitative synthesis shows that
operating windows and kinetic parameters are strongly system-dependent:
reported examples range from industrial jarosite precipitation near 90–95 °C to
low-temperature continuous precipitation, while apparent activation energies
around 42–44 kJ mol−1 recur in selected crystallization/dissolution studies but
do not establish a universal mechanism. Selectivity must be evaluated jointly
with residual Fe, valuable-metal loss, particle size, filtration behavior, cake
moisture, and residue stability. The revised six-gate framework therefore requires
measurable evidence at each decision stage rather than a single Fe-removal
target. The review identifies persistent gaps in high-ionic-strength
thermodynamic modeling, standardized kinetic reporting, quantitative
solid–liquid separation data, continuous pilot validation, closed mass
balances, and integrated techno-economic/life-cycle assessment.

